May 22, 2013 Super Bass Kai Ashante Wilson Is Gian’s love for the Summer King stronger than his hate? May 15, 2013 The Button Man and the Murder Tree Cherie Priest An all-new Wild Cards story May 14, 2013 Shall We Gather Alex Bledsoe When one world brushes another, asking the right question can be magic… May 8, 2013 Fire Above, Fire Below Garth Nix The dragon below our city has died. What is to be done?
From The Blog
May 23, 2013
Is There A New New Wave of Science Fiction, And Do We Need One Anyway?
David Barnett
May 20, 2013
The Wheel of Time Unfettered: A Non-Spoiler Review of “River of Souls”
Leigh Butler
May 20, 2013
Shall We Begin? Star Trek Into Darkness Spoiler Review
Keith DeCandido
May 19, 2013
It’s a Promise You Make. Doctor Who: "The Name of the Doctor"
Chris Lough
May 17, 2013
Supernatural’s Dean Winchester Dismantled His Own Machismo...
Emily Asher-Perrin
Showing posts by: Paula R. Stiles click to see Paula R. Stiles's profile
Mon
Sep 13 2010 12:03pm

Whenever I hear horror fans talk about zombies and vampires, I’m dismayed at the absolute geek-certainty with which they promote the Romero zombie and the Stoker vampire as the only “true” variants of revenants (dead brought back to some kind of life). Yet neither story accurately reflects the historical record. Revenants are a much more varied and much more vaguely-defined group of monsters than either Romero or Stoker has given us. Romero’s cannibalistic zombies are more like medieval European vampires (but without the religious undertones; I’ll get to that in a bit) while Stoker’s vampires are more like traditional, Caribbean-style zombies who are slaves to their “maker.” There’s a lot more overlap than fans think.

[Let’s look at three famous ancient and medieval types]